By MIKE SALINERO | The Tampa Tribune
Published: October 19, 2011

» 0 Comments | Post a Comment

TAMPA —

A proposal to restructure the current makeup of the Hillsborough County Commission won enough support from commissioners today to go forward for further debate.

Commissioners voted 7-0 to hold a workshop later this year on changing the current board makeup of four single-member districts and three countywide seats, by adding another single-member district and reducing the countywide seats to two.

Commissioner Les Miller, the board’s only black member, proposed the change, saying it would bring government closer to the people.

The current system was set up in 1983 and was partly a reaction to a scandal that saw three commissioners jailed for taking kickbacks.

But Miller said the county’s explosive growth since that time — from 650,000 residents counted in the 1980 census to more than 1.2 million people now — has made the single-member districts unwieldy. The four current commission districts average 307,000 people. Adding a district would reduce the average population to 247,000 people.

“We need to have smaller single member districts so people can get closer to their commissioners,” Miller said.

Adding a district would also make it more likely that one district would tilt toward a Hispanic representative, Miller said. A coalition of Hispanic groups pressed the commissioner earlier this year to increase the Hispanic population in District 1, represented by Sandy Murman, to 36 percent. Commissioners rejected the idea.

Miller was supported by two board members who served with him in the Florida Legislature: Murman and Victor Crist. Murman noted that all 40 state senators and 120 House members serve geographic districts. She said she found the commission structure, with countywide seats, “odd.”

Crist said reducing the geographic size and population of commission districts would reduce the amount of money candidates would have to raise to run a campaign.

“I just appreciate smaller government because it gives greater access to your elected officials,” Crist said, “and frankly a process where it’s easier for the everyday person to run for office and get elected.”

Other commissioners expressed concerns. Kevin Beckner, the only other Democrat on the board besides Miller, said he appreciated the current structure because it allows voters to cast ballots for a majority of the board: the voter’s district representative and three countywide commissioners.

“By changing to that system, we’re looking at diluting the voice of the majority and the representation of the majority,” Beckner said.

Commissioner Mark Sharpe said a board dominated by district representatives could lead to a “Balkanization” of policy, with commissioners fighting so hard for their districts that they ignore the welfare of the county as a whole.

Commissioner Ken Hagan, who also expressed concerns, said he would second a motion to hold a workshop to discuss the matter further.

Restructuring the commission would require a referendum to amend the county charter. Managing County Attorney Mary Helen Farris said an ordinance calling for a referendum during the November 2012 election would have to be ready by May or June of next year.

By TED JACKOVICS | The Tampa Tribune 

Published: August 01, 2011
Updated: August 01, 2011 – 5:17 PM

TAMPA —

The HART board today voted to increase the maximum possible millage rate to balance its 2012 and 2013 budgets by an amount that would add 41 cents to the average homeowner’s transit-related property tax to $45.21 a year

Without an increase in the millage rate from 0.4682 per $1,000 of household value to 0.5 mills, the Hillsborough Area Regional Transit Authority would lose $1.84 million in revenue next year because property values have declined, HART staff members said.

That would create further bus service reductions in addition to those enacted this summer and planned for November, HART staff members said.

The HART board adopts a millage rate Sept. 26. Hillsborough County Commissioners do not vote on HART millage.

HART commissioners Sandra Murman, also a county commissioner, and John Byczek opposed the increase in millage. Murman said she could not support any tax increase at this point in time.

HART commissioner and county commissioner Mark Sharpe said he changed his mind at the meeting to support the millage rate increase because he was concerned – as were other HART board members – that service cuts would be counterproductive to residents’ efforts to reach work or get jobs.

In other business, the HART board approved a contract to purchase 41 new shelters in 2012 from Tolar Manufacturing Co. Inc., for a price not to exceed $846,220.

HART has one shelter for every seven bus stops, up from one in every 15 three years ago. There are currently more than 3,500 bus stops throughout Hillsborough County.”This is good news for our customers who want more coverage from extreme weather elements this area experiences,” HART spokeswoman Marcia Mejia said.

Commissioner Murman mentioned in this Creative Loafing article on HART:

Posted by Mitch Perry on Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 11:46 AM

As we’ve noted on various occasions, last November’s rejection of a transit tax in Hillsborough County not only killed the possibility of a light rail system being built anytime soon, but nine months later, there aren’t any plans now over the next 10 years to revisit the issue.

However, members who serve on Hillsborough County’s transit agency, HART, have said that what they can do for now is to concentrate on what they do best – efficient bus service.

But when it came time on Monday to vote to approve a maximum millage rate that the board will consider, which meant voting for a minimal increase in taxes to alleviate a large reduction in service, one Hillsborough County Republican chose to eschew the no-taxes mantra of his party and supported the modest measure, and one did not.

The millage increase would go from .4682 to .5. When the issue came before the board two months ago, both Sandy Murman and Mark Sharpe voted against it.

Murman said again Monday that she couldn’t support the raise, saying she would look like a “hypocrite” after supporting a decrease in the millage last week with her position on the County Commission. “I think we have to dig a little deeper,” she said, adding that asking all of the taxpayers in Hillsborough to raise their millage when only a small percentage utilize their services would be unfair.

But commissioner Kevin Beckner warned that a failure to raise the millage would interfere with the stated goal of the board to increase its basic services, not cut them. He then asked Katharine Eagan, the chief operating officer for HART, what would happen if the board ultimately voted not to increase the millage?

She recited a litany of service cuts that would include, eliminating weekend service in south Hillsborough on weekends, no service out to Brandon hospital on weekends, no Christmas or Thanksgiving service, and fewer rides from Brandon to MacDill Air Force Base.

HART has already cut 1.4 percent of its bus routes since March of 2010, but another reduction would eliminate two to three percent of current routes, or roughly twice as much as what has already been cut.

It was also revealed that the millage increase, which would add $1.8 million to HART’s coffers, would break down to about 41 cents per month to Hillsborough citizens via their property taxes (that’s based on the average household value of $90,420 in 2012).

After listening to Eagan, Hillsborough County Commissioner Mark Sharpe said that he had changed his mind, and would now vote for the tax increase. Calling Commissioner a “kindred spirit,” Sharpe said he understood where she was coming from, but said he couldn’t go along with her in not approving the raise, adding,”My concern is we’d be entering into a death spiral, we’d be fulfilling a prophesy,” by eliminating service routes.

Today’s vote was on setting the maximum millage, but not the final vote locking in the new millage rates.