Commissioner Murman quoted in this Tampa Bay Times article on transit study:

 

Long-awaited Tampa Bay transit study identifies five corridors for future transportation systems

 

By Caitlin Johnston, Times staff writer

Published: April 22, 2017

 

The firm assembling a highly anticipated study has identified five potential routes for a future transit system in Tampa Bay.

This is the first big update in the regional premium transit feasibility plan, a cumbersome term for a process that will identify whether rail, express bus or other types of transit will best serve the region.

A team from Jacobs Engineering expects to narrow that list and recommend three specific projects — including the exact routes and the type of transit that will operate on them — by November, said Jacobs executive Scott Pringle.

Politicians and transit advocates alike have placed a lot of weight on this 2½-year study, which the Florida Department of Transportation paid $1.5 million for and the Hillsborough Area Regional Transit Authority is overseeing. They hope it can provide some sort of blueprint for one day solving the bay area’s transportation woes.

“I am depending on this study a lot to be a real, unbiased analysis of what this region needs to solve its transportation challenges,” said Tampa City Council member Harry Cohen. “My hope is that they’re evaluating every conceivable option.”

Politicians, business leaders and residents have discussed building transit options for decades, but have failed to garner enough support or political will to fund or build most of them.

The five corridors Jacobs selected are a mix of routes between Hillsborough, Pinellas and Pasco counties, connecting the area’s densest regions and busiest road corridors:

  • West Shore to Brandon through downtown Tampa
  • Downtown Tampa to the University of South Florida
  • Wesley Chapel to USF, then to Tampa and St. Petersburg
  • Clearwater to the St. Petersburg Gateway area to downtown
  • South Tampa to downtown Tampa.

The potential routes were evaluated based on how many popular destinations and activity centers they served, along with the number of jobs, amenities and population per mile. The next step is to evaluate what type of transit would operate best in each area. Those modes could include a streetcar, express bus, light rail or other options.

All these routes have already been evaluated by several of the nearly 60 different transportation studies that have been conducted over the past three decades in Tampa Bay. The goal of this study is to draw on those previous findings, identify the best projects, put together an actual plan and draft state and federal grant applications to help fund them.

“We’re not trying to do just another study,” Pringle said. “We’re trying to pull together a plan from all those studies. … Let’s build on those lessons learned and move this thing forward.”

The initiative, though originally called the premium transit study when the DOT first announced it in late 2015, has since been rebranded as a feasibility plan to highlight the fact that it will produce an actual proposal for local leaders to act on.

Jacobs will ultimately identify three specific projects to build in Tampa Bay, Pringle said, and rank them in the order they should be built. Once the projects are selected, the next phases of the study will decide how to pay for them and who will maintain and operate them.

Hillsborough County Commissioner and HART board member Sandy Murman was disappointed that none of the corridors connect to South Hillsborough, the district she represents. She also complained that the firm was using out-of-date population numbers. She encouraged them to look at parts of the region, such as her district, that are experiencing more growth.

“There’s a balancing act between the suburban area versus the urban area,” Murman said. “I didn’t see a lot out in the unincorporated areas.”

Her concerns highlight one of the biggest obstacles facing transit in Tampa Bay: how to build support for a project that may not serve everybody. Ultimately, the plan is to build an expansive, integrated system with main corridors connected to other parts of the region by buses, circulators and other transit options. But creating an entire network takes time and money, and it can’t all be built at once.

“To develop a transit system for a very sprawled-out community like we have is going to be very, very difficult,” Murman said. “We have to work with HART to build connections to those main routes and make sure the taxpayers know we’re not just going to do one area.”

Murman, however, voted against the most recent attempt to raise money for transit. The Hillsborough County Commission decided in April 2016 not to put a 30-year, half-cent sales tax referendum to fund transportation on the November ballot.

Hillsborough has since found more than $800 million in the county budget to spend on road projects. But by its own estimates, the county has more than $8 billion worth of transportation needs in the coming decade.

Previous attempts to pass a sales tax for transportation failed in Hillsborough in 2010 and in Pinellas in 2014, largely because of a lack of support from voters outside the downtown areas. Many suburban residents see transit as something that benefits only the urban cores, and thus don’t want to pay for something they won’t use.

Trying to plan a regional system further complicates this. There is no regional transit agency that would oversee such a project. An attempt by state Sen. Jack Latvala, R-Clearwater, to create such an agency recently died in the Florida Senate.

There’s also the issue of regional competition: If a corridor based largely in one county is chosen as the first project, leaders and citizens in other counties might feel slighted or wonder why they should support it.

“That’s a very, very, very hard thing for elected officials to do,” Cohen said. “But so far, I do think people understand that there are going to have to be concessions all over the place for a truly regional approach to work.”

 

Commissioner Murman quoted in this SPB article on the Ferry project:

 

Hillsborough Commission expresses caution about fully investing in Cross-Bay Ferry for second year

MITCH PERRY

April 19, 2017

 

Hillsborough County Commissioners sounded impressed by the relative success of the Cross-Bay Ferry pilot project between Tampa and St. Petersburg that concludes at the end of this month, but whether they are prepared to spend another $350,000 to fund a repeat performance later this year remains uncertain.

After hearing a presentation from St. Petersburg Mayor Rick Kriseman, whose leadership led to the project happening, the board passed a motion to have County Administrator Mike Merrill review whether the board can find the funds to subsidize its portion of the four-government pilot project later this year.

 

Curbing his enthusiasm somewhat, Kriseman began his address to the Board by acknowledging that the ferry is hardly the solution to the Tampa Bay area’s vexing transportation issues. “It is simply an additional tool in our toolbox that works toward those solutions that I think all of us seek and know that we’ve got those challenges that we’ve got to address if we’re going to grow out counties and our region,” he said.

The St. Petersburg mayor, who is running for re-election this year, unveiled a PowerPoint presentation filled with statistics to measure who has actually taken the ferry over the past five-and-a-half months. At the end of March, more than 31,000 people had ridden on the ferry, with organizers hoping the total number could hit 40,000 before it ends in 12 days.

Kriseman said that expectations were low for people to commute to work on the ferry, especially with the project using only one boat. During weekdays the service offers only two full round trips, with three on the weekends.

The visit to the Hillsborough Commissioners was the mayor’s second appearance before one of the four local governments who contributed the $350,000 to get the project with HMS Global Maritime rolling last fall. He will visit the Tampa City Council next week.

The survey shows that 90 percent of passengers were Tampa Bay residents, but Board Chairman Stacy White said he wanted those numbers broken down further by zip code, questioning how many people living in the outlying parts of both counties were using the service, vs. those living in Tampa and St. Petersburg.

 

Nearly everyone – 95 percent – said they enjoyed the experience.

The ferry has had a farebox recovery rate of 35 percent. That’s higher, Kriseman noted, than the standard farebox recovery for bus systems, which is around 20 percent.  (Farebox recovery is the proportion of the amount of revenue generated through fares by its paying customers as a fraction of the cost of its total operating expenses).

 

One of the biggest disappointments was that the ferry was inoperable during high profile events like Gasparilla and the Saturday before the national college football playoff game. Kriseman said that the lack of a permanent docking station was the culprit. The ferry has been taking off the Vinoy Basin in St. Petersburg, and dropping off passengers next to the Tampa Convention Center.

Commissioner Les Miller noted that the passenger loads were less than filled to capacity in the opening weeks of the ferry service, but grew noticeably in recent months. What changed, he asked Kriseman.

 

The mayor acknowledged that the reduction of the fare had a considerable influence on ridership, dropping one-way tickets from $10 to $5 on weekdays, but he said he thought the number one factor was the awareness and word of mouth factor.

The local governments will not get their $350,000 back, but they will collect some funds to reduce the subsidy when it ends later this month. As of the end of March, more than $111,000 was scheduled to be returned to Tampa, St. Pete, Hillsborough and Pinellas Counties, with the mayor predicting they will receive a check back for approximately $30,000. “It rarely pays for itself,” he said of transportation outlays, a comment frequently invoked by local officials advocating for light-rail in recent years.

An optimistic Kriseman said in addition to ferry service in Hillsborough County and from downtown Tampa to downtown St. Petersburg, he also mused about ferries running from St. Pete to the Westshore area of Tampa. “Not only giving people the opportunity to go to work in Westshore, but also to take a shuttle to Tampa International Airport and not have to rent a car.”

“This was one of the best reports that have come back to us that we’ve made,” enthused Commissioner Sandy Murman after Kriseman’s presentation Murman reminded the public that the board did approve a proposal two weeks ago to move forward on a much delayed public-private partnership ferry plan to take passengers from South County to MacDill Air Force Base, then to St. Petersburg.

 

“I don’t know if we can go up to $350,000 the next round,” she admitted about a similar Tampa-St. Pete Cross-Bay Ferry project for 2017-2018. “I think we’re building a very solid case for continuing this.”

“The wife and daughter and I enjoy our moments crossing the bay on the ferry, ” said Commissioner Victor Crist. ” They’re memorable moments.”

 

Merrill said that “there are enormous needs and enormous opportunities,” regarding the upcoming budget discussions, but said that the Cross-Bay Ferry project would fit into the “return on investment category” in the budget, where it could hopefully recoup all of their investment next year.

“It’s probably a little bit early to judge how this would fit with all the others (budgetary issues) because we haven’t really finalized all of the work that we plan to bring back on May 9th,” Merrill said, adding that his staff will seriously look at the funding request.

 

Commissioner Murman quoted in this FOX13 News article on ferry service:

Hillsborough commissioner pushes for permanent ferry service

 

By: Haley Hinds, FOX 13 News

 

POSTED:APR 05 2017 10:13PM EDT

UPDATED:APR 05 2017 11:23PM EDT

 

 

TAMPA (FOX 13) – Joan Routt and Nancy Height were all smiles as the Cross-Bay Ferry docked in Tampa Wednesday afternoon.

“Oh, I enjoyed it. I love boating,” said Routt. “It was my first trip today.”

“We saw dolphins out there today, too!” exclaimed Height. “It went fast. It was really rough out there today and we really didn’t feel that much of the waves.”

We are now in the final stretch of the six-month Cross-Bay Ferry pilot project. April 30 will be its final run. Currently, the Cross-Bay Ferry only stops near the Tampa Convention Center and in downtown St. Pete.

Between November and April, the ferry carried more than 31,000 passengers. According to Cross-Bay Ferry officials, more than 90 percent of riders were residents, not tourists.

With growing ridership, Hillsborough County Commissioner Ken Hagan is proposing a more permanent ferry system with HMS Ferries/South Swell. The proposal would connect several more locations in Tampa Bay.

“From south shore to MacDill, from Tampa to St. Pete,” Hagan explained. “We would pay a fee up front and lock in a long-term operational and capital agreement for 15-20 years that again places all the costs and all of the risks and burden on the private sector and protects the taxpayers.”

The plan would also include construction of multiple marinas that would support the ferries and also be open for public use. The plan got plenty of support from commissioners at Wednesday’s meeting.

“It could be a very lucrative venture where we could very easily double or triple our investment,” said Commissioner Victor Crist.

“It does create jobs. Very important. Good for the environment. Tourism,” added Commissioner Sandy Murman. “There is a very strong business case to move forward with the ferry project.”

Despite all the agreement, there was one area of disagreement: how to pay for it. Hagan initially proposed using the county’s $22 million dollar BP oil spill settlement. Commissioner Les Miller, Jr. felt that money should be focused on environment issues.

“I don’t think that’s the proper way to go,” said Commissioner Les Miller, Jr. “Those dollars came to us because of the destruction that was done on the environment. Our parks people utilize constantly, that’s what that money should be used for.”

Those who support the plan argue the environment does play a role. “It gets cars off of the road and it gets emissions out of our air and the possibilities of a marina could be economic as well,” said Crist.

The commission agreed that if the project moves forward, it would not just utilize BP money, but federal funds as well.

From here, Hagan said a consultant will review the feasibility of building marinas and where potential locations will be. Meanwhile, county staff members will negotiate with HMS in hopes of reaching a long-term agreement to consider.

 

Commissioner Murman quoted in this Tampa Bay Times article on ferry service:

 

Hillsborough sets aside $22 million BP settlement for permanent ferry service

 

By Steve Contorno, Times Staff Writer

Published: April 5, 2017

 

TAMPA — In the waning days of the Cross-Bay Ferry pilot program, Hillsborough County laid the groundwork Wednesday to make water transportation a permanent fixture in the Tampa Bay region.

Commissioners voted to keep in reserve $22 million from the BP oil spill settlement with the hope it could one day go toward expanded ferry service, including a route between the downtowns of Tampa and St. Petersburg.

However, commissioners also said getting there will require re-imagining a project that has stalled for years due to federal red tape, environmental concerns and lack of funding.

“For this project to materialize, to be successful, it must involve a public-private partnership,” County Commissioner Ken Hagan said. “The challenge in my mind is determining the best model.”

For several years, Hillsborough County has had a standing, short-term agreement with two companies, HMS Ferries and South Swell, to someday open a commuter ferry line between south county and MacDill Air Force Base. Under that pact, the county would pay for the capital costs, and the companies would cover operating expenses.

On Wednesday, commissioners asked staffers to renegotiate that arrangement into a long-term deal of up to 20 years. In a new deal, the county also would like to see HMS Ferries and South Swell take on all the risk — and potential financial reward — of the entire project. In return, the county would write the companies a check, though it’s not clear for how much. The project was estimated to cost the county $25 million to $30 million.

“This would mean likely paying more up front but in doing so we can achieve a long-term agreement for 15 or 20 years,” Hagan said, “and we will not be responsible for all of the other issues associated with this project.”

Additionally, commissioners want a new deal to guarantee service from south county to Tampa as well as a route between the downtowns of Tampa and St. Petersburg. The current agreement says market demand would dictate whether those routes are offered. Many area leaders and ferry advocates believe that demand was demonstrated by the six-month ferry pilot program linking downtown St. Petersburg to downtown Tampa that is scheduled to end April 30.

The Cross-Bay Ferry sold nearly 8,000 tickets in March, according to numbers released Wednesday, bringing total ridership to 31,362 since the service launched in October.

“It is amazing,” Commissioner Sandy Murman said. “The ferry, I think, has passed the test. We know there is strong demand for water transit.”

Still, much remains up in the air. The county has set aside $750,000 for a study of the project that will, among other things, determine a viable launch site in south county. The Schultz Preserve is one potential location.

Tampa and St. Petersburg would have to agree to the terms of any deal that services their cities, and they would also likely have to contribute to the project. Hillsborough, Pinellas County, St. Petersburg and Tampa each put in $750,000 to the pilot program but it’s not clear that kind of rare regional cooperation could be replicated to support a more ambitious expansion.

Even if they received the go-ahead tomorrow, it will take three years before the boats are operating full time, said Ed Turanchik, who represents the two private companies.

There’s not yet full support for the ferry in Hillsborough, either. Commissioner Les Miller, a persistent skeptic of the project, said the BP money was given to Hillsborough out of an environmental disaster and a ferry doesn’t fit the spirit of the award.

“The vast majority,” Miller said, “should go into our conservation and environmental lands.”

But he may be outnumbered.

“I consider it a transformative project,” Commissioner Pat Kemp said, “and well worthy of anything we could put forward in terms of our BP oil resources.”

 

Commissioner Murman quoted in this Tampa Bay Times article on puppy sales ban:

 

Ban on puppy sales moves forward in Hillsborough County

 

By Steve Contorno, Times Staff Writer

Published: April 5, 2017

 

TAMPA — Looking to curb abusive puppy mills, Hillsborough County commissioners moved ahead Wednesday with a proposal to ban the commercial sale of cats and dogs.

Under the proposed ordinance, new pet stores would be able to sell only dogs or cats purchased from local animal rescues. They would be barred from getting their supply of animals from large-scale breeders.

Existing pet stores, however, would still be able to operate here unrestrained, a concession commissioners made after hearing complaints from the owners and employees of a Hillsborough puppy store.

Commissioner Ken Hagan, who brought forward the proposed ban, said many breeders incorporate abusive practices and house animals in inhumane conditions. Those abuses aren’t always readily apparent when people visit pet stores with cute puppies in the window.

Most of the industry’s suppliers aren’t in Florida, so shutting down commercial sales is the only way to guarantee dogs and cats aren’t coming from these breeders, he said.

“Eliminating the sales outlet is essential to addressing this problem,” Hagan said. “It doesn’t make sense to import animals when we already have thousands of unwanted animals.”

According to the county attorney’s office, 48 other Florida jurisdictions have passed similar restrictions.

The proposed regulations drew an outcry from owners and employees of All About Puppies, which operates two of the three existing commercial pet stores in Hillsborough County, one in Carrollwood and the other in Brandon. The other Hillsborough store is Puppies Tampa on N Dale Mabry Highway.

Supporters of All About Puppies flooded the public comment period of Wednesday’s meeting, wearing baby blue T-shirts with the slogan “My puppy my choice.”

“This ordinance as written 100 percent force-closes my business in 90 days,” store owner William Roland said.

Advocates of the new rule noted stores could still sell rescue dogs and cats. But All About Puppies’ argument gained traction with several commissioners, who said they didn’t want to see county regulation shutter a business.

“I do not want to put anybody out of business today. That’s wrong,” Commissioner Sandy Murman said. “America was founded on people having the right to open a business, keep a business and operate it without fear of government regulation.”

Ultimately, commissioners voted to grandfather in the three existing pet stores and will create an incentive program that encourages them to get their dogs and cats from the county’s Pet Resource Center and other local shelters.

The ordinance does not affect large pet stores like PetSmart because they already utilize rescued dogs and cats exclusively, Hagan said.

A public hearing and final vote on the ordinance is expected next month.

Commissioners also asked county staffers to prepare regulations that crack down on suppliers over concerns that stopping pet sales won’t be enough to prevent abusive breeders.

“It’s feeding the wrong end of the dog,” Commissioner Victor Crist said, “because what we’re going to end up doing is something that does nothing to stop the puppy mills.”

 

Commissioner Murman quoted in this SPB article on the ferry project:

 

Hillsborough moves forward on ferry project that may use BP settlement funds

MITCH PERRY

15 hours ago

 

While the Cross-Bay Ferry reportedly carries nearly 8,000 passengers in March as the six-month pilot project ends later this month, Hillsborough County Commissioners approved a proposal Wednesday to move ahead on a public-private partnership plan to take passengers from South County to MacDill Air Force Base, then to St. Petersburg.

The plan would include using the $22 million settlement money the county received from the BP oil spill while building a marina that could be used to service the ferry in southeastern Hillsborough County.

Commissioner Ken Hagan said he’s wanted to present the plan since the country received the $22.8 million in BP funds in the summer of 2015.

 

“I want to stress that this agenda item does not lock us into a marina or a ferry agreement,” he told his colleagues. “It is simply considering a different model or approach in an attempt to achieve a long-term operating and capital agreement.”

The plan would also include hiring a consultant who works on ferry projects to study where the public marina should be located.

It’s been nearly four years since attorney and public transportation advocate Ed Turanchik held a news conference with officials from Seattle-based HMS Ferries and South Swell Development Group to discuss a public-private partnership that would initiate Tampa Bay’s first commuter, recreational and tourist passenger ferry service.

 

The original idea came from county studies showing that thousands of commuters who live in South Hillsborough County and drive to MacDill Air Force Base on a daily basis would take a ferry service if it were an option.

Initial costs for the project were estimated between $11.5-$16 million, with more recent projections doubling that amount. In 2014, Tampa U.S. Representative Kathy Castor procured a $4.8 million Federal Transit Administration grant, bringing momentum to the plan.

 

But the project bogged down when Turanchik’s originally proposed site for the terminal in Southeastern Hillsborough County – the Fred and Idah Schultz Preserve just north of Apollo Beach – drew opposition from some environmental groups.

County Administrator Mike Merrill said that the original interim agreement with HMS & South Swell “was created with a different approach,” but said that it was time now to look at a different model “for a lot of reasons.”

The proposals (the board separated the vote into three separate motions) were all approved unanimously, 6-0 (Commissioner Al Higginbotham was absent).

 

“We’re getting to a point where we can make hard and fast decisions,” said Commissioner Sandy Murman, who has been a strong advocate for the ferry going back to 2013.  She also extolled the success of the Cross-Bay Ferry, which sold a record 7,990 tickets in March, a 31-percent over February, which was the previous high water mark since the six-month pilot project running from Tampa to St. Petersburg began in November.

 

Commissioner Victor Crist said he and his constituents in Northern Hillsborough County like the idea of a municipal marina. “It could be a very lucrative venture where we could very easily double or triple our investment,” he said.

 

The board also approved an amendment from Commission Chair Stacy White to direct staff to incorporate federal funds in the funding mechanism.

 

Commissioners had already said they were willing to drop the $4.8 million FTA grant because of the excessive bureaucracy required to accept those funds, causing a delay in the project.

Murman said it was worth the request because she believes the Trump administration is going to introduce a federal infrastructure plan “without strings.”

“If he does that and this does qualify, we may want to go that route,” she said, admitting that she didn’t know for certain.

 

Commissioner Murman mentioned in this SPB article on lobbying ordinance:

 

Hillsborough Commissioners add themselves to new lobbying ordinance

MITCH PERRY

19 hours ago

 

Hillsborough County Commissioners added themselves to a previously drafted amendment to an ordinance that would prohibit registered lobbyists from communicating electronically during commission meetings.

The proposal before the board would have only penalized lobbyists on Wednesday, prompting Commission Chair Les Miller to say that it was insufficient, and that “we as the County Commission should also adhere to the lobbying ordinance.”

 

Miller offered two new amendments that the board ultimately approved. One added “commissioners” to the provision that in the case that an electronic communication sent by a lobbyist during a meeting “could not be avoided,” that lobbyist must immediately notify the lobbyist registration manager. Now a commissioner has to notify that system as well. It passed 5-2, with Victor Crist and Ken Hagan opposing.

 

The second amendment would fine commissioners for violating the ordinance. The original draft only included lobbyists. The first fine would be $250, the second offense $500, and a third offense would require the lobbyist registration manager to inform the Florida Ethics Commission. The measure passed 5-2, with Hagan and Stacy White opposing.

 

“Candidly, I think it’s a joke,” cracked Hagan about the proposals. “It’s symbolic, repetitive, impotent and has no teeth.”

In December, Commissioners approved a motion offered by Commissioner Sandy Murman directing county attorneys to draft a proposal that would ban them from receiving text messages from a lobbyist during a board meeting, a variation of new lobbying rules promulgated in Tallahassee by House Speaker Richard Corcoran.

 

In January 2016, the BOCC passed an ordinance requiring all lobbyists to register by name, who they met with, what they talked about and who they represented when meeting with board members. The ordinance was prompted by the controversy surrounding how transportation engineer Parsons Brinckerhoff became the contractor for the Go Hillsborough transportation effort — and then hiring Beth Leytham as a subcontractor.

 

Leytham never registered as a lobbyist with the county when she communicated with commissioners via text message and/or email during that process.

 

Commissioner Murman quoted in this Tampa Bay Times article on Dollar General:

 

Apollo Beach residents rallying against proposed Dollar General store

 

By Kelsey Sunderland, Times Correspondent

Published: March 1, 2017

 

APOLLO BEACH — For the last two weekends, Apollo Beach residents have gathered on the corner of Fairway Boulevard and Apollo Beach Boulevard to protest the building of a stand-alone Dollar General on the site.

They’re hoping to garner 1,000 signatures on an online petition to send to Dollar General’s Florida real estate manager, Kevin Gromosaik.

Resident Edward Perez, who has lived in the area for three years, believes the store will change the aesthetic of the community.

“If you look around here, what you see are beautiful homes, all residential in a nice area,” Perez said. “There are a lot of things they could put here, but Dollar General is just not a good fit for the area. We’d prefer a park or a playground or another small business.”

Many residents also cite the increased traffic it may bring to the location, within walking distance of Apollo Beach Elementary School.

“There are 670 students that attend that elementary school,” said resident Jamie Saracino. “There have been traffic fatalities as it is. This is going to ruin our community.”

In a statement, Dollar General said they are considering the customer’s best interest in regards to the new location. Dollar General currently has 36 stores in Hillsborough County.

The statement also indicated that Dollar General officials are considering relocating its store at 6422 U.S. 41 to the site in question, but has not committed to the relocation. It’s doing “due diligence” and expects to make a final decision in late spring 2017.

“Should we move forward with the project, the new store would provide area residents with an expanded retail store including a wider assortment of product offerings including additional cooler doors for perishable items,” the statement said. “We know convenience is a major factor in our customers’ shopping decisions as we generally serve customers within a 3- to 5-mile radius. We also take demographic trends, competitive factors, traffic patterns and community concerns into consideration.”

The property, which was zoned for commercial use by the county in 1979, has remained vacant since, but last November site plans were approved by the county for Dollar General to occupy the space.

Perez said he didn’t find out about the plan until the middle of February.

Residents have also enlisted the help of County Commissioner Sandra Murman, who says she is on their side with the situation and planning a meeting with Perez and his wife, Kendall.

“Our staff and I are working hard for a potential solution to this situation and I want you to know that I am extremely disappointed about this project with a commercial building in the middle of a residential neighborhood,” Murman wrote in an email. “Whatever happens on this, I do plan to ask staff to bring a recommendation back to the board to prevent this type of problem from happening again.”

Hillsborough County Development Services Director Adam Gormly believes that once the residents are given the facts surrounding Dollar General’s move to the location, they will have a better understanding of the project’s approval.

“We’re planning on hosting some area residents here on Friday (March 3) to present the facts associated with this project,” Gormly said.

By Tuesday, the residents’ petition had 830 signatures out of the expected 1,000 before it is sent to Gromosaik.

“We want Dollar General to know we’re not going to support them,” Kendall Perez said. “People like them now, where they are next to Publix but we won’t support them moving to this location.”

 

 

Commissioner Murman quoted in this Tampa Bay Times article on transportation plan:

 

Hillsborough Commissioners vote 6-1 to approve road-centric $812 million, 10-year transportation plan

Wednesday, March 1, 2017 12:55pm

 

TAMPA — Hillsborough County Commissioners approved a road-centric $812 million, 10-year transportation plan Wednesday despite calls from residents and one of their own for more transit options.

The proposal will pump about $276 million into road and bridge maintenance, $127 million for safety projects and $346 million for congestion relief, such as widening and building new roads and improving traffic flow.

The list of projects represents the largest commitment to transportation by the county in years, and it achieves it without raising taxes. Commissioners voted last year to set aside $600 million from the existing budget to pay for roadwork. The remaining $212 million will come from new fees on developers and other sources.

Nevertheless, residents lined up to implore commissioners to put more money into the county’s bus system and to find other ways to move people without building more roads. The only transit in the project list are about $750,000 to plan and design a ferry between MacDill Air Force Base and south county and $350,000 for a pilot program that allows residents to request a car ride to bus stops.

Commissioner Pat Kemp joined the criticism of the plan.

“We cannot build our way out of congestion,” Kemp said. “It’s time we make some wise investments.”

Kemp proposed eliminating several of the projects, including a $97 million widening of Lithia Pinecrest Road. Instead, she wanted to use the money to fast track the ferry, expand the car service pilot program and to pump money into a Tampa Bay Area Regional Transportation Authority program that provides vans for people who want to carpool.

But other commissioners were content to move forward and continue working to find other ways to pay for transit. It passed 6-1, with Kemp as the lone dissent.

“We’ve got to find a dedicated funding source to support transit funding,” Commissioner Sandy Murman said. “Not a band aid approach.”

 

Commissioner Murman quoted in this StPetersBlog article on transportation funding:

 

Hillsborough County Commission approve $811 million to fund roads, $1 million for transit

MITCH PERRY

 

Hillsborough County Commissioners approved a proposal Wednesday to spend $812 million on transportation over the next decade, with almost all of that money going directly for roads, rejecting a last-minute alternative offered by Commissioner Pat Kemp to redirect much of those funds to more transit projects.

The 6-1 vote (with Kemp dissenting) came after more than 40 members of the public signed up to speak about the proposal, with many reciting desultory statistics about how the county is the worst in the nation when it comes to funding transit.

A total of $276 million will go towards road and bridge repairs, and $127 million will go towards improving safety at intersections and near schools.  There is $750,000 slated to go towards planning and designing a ferry project that would run from southeast Hillsborough County to MacDill Air Force Base.

Kemp, a member of the Sierra Club who ran as a pro-transit advocate in both of her runs for county commission in 2014 and 2016, introduced a very specific alternative proposal to her colleagues at the end of the public comment portion of the hearing on Wednesday.

Acknowledging that “the train had pretty much left the station” in regards to years long work leading up to Wednesday’s vote, Kemp said that she felt a “responsibility and duty” to offer her best response to the critical issue of transit funding in the county.

“What we have here is a project list,” Kemp said.”What we need is a system plan.”

Kemp’s plan (as she floated on Tuesday) called for expanding an already existing van pool program by 100 vans in 2018 and another 100 vans in 2019; expand HART’s HyperLink program into Town N Country and Sun City Center; invest $2 million to HART to identify how to invest in bus service,  and invest more in trails and greenway development.

 

However, it failed to gain a second vote on the board, and died instantly on the floor.

Commissioner Sandy Murman praised several of Kemp’s ideas, adding in a motion to come back and potentially incorporate several of her ideas in the two-year budget cycle. But she said it was important to follow “the process,” adding that “we can’t just slap money at HART right now without knowing what we’re throwing money at.”

 

Included as part of Kemp’s calculations was removing the $97 million set aside in the plan given to commissioners to wide Lithia Pinecrest Road, an item that sparked considerable debate both for and against it by eastern Hillsborough residents.

Critics contended it was only on the list of approved projects because the Brandon Chamber of Commerce backed it, while supporters said that congestion on the one-lane road made it prohibitive to have it widened.

The vote came less than a year after the Hillsborough BOCC twice rejected the opportunity to place the half-cent sales tax for the transportation known as Go Hillsborough.

Two of the three commissioners who supported the plan last year, Ken Hagan and Les Miller, didn’t shy away from the fact that some of the members of the public calling for more transit on Wednesday were critical of Go Hillsborough, despite the fact that it included $515 million for transit in the first 10 years, or 43 percent of the plan.

 

“I find it extremely hypocritical and disingenuous that some of the same people who opposed the transportation referendum, are now the same ones demanding transit funding now,” Hagan said.

Most of the members of the public who attended the meeting called on the board to support

“We have a world class airport in our city,” said Tampa resident Darren Booth. “It’s managed growth, the same growth that our road system doesn’t manage. The airport is managing growth because they have a leader, they have a plan, and they’re implementing their plan. What you’re doing now is not working.”

 

Tea Party activist Sharon Calvert supported the proposal, but requested that the county list the projects included in the $812 million, and some of the criteria about why they’re in the plan. “I think it would bring some comfort to making sure that we’re doing the right projects today,” she said.

 

Calvert also requested that the BOCC look at the Hillsborough Area Regional Transit Authority (HART) Transportation Development Plan, a sentiment shared not only by her colleague, HART board member Karen Jaroch, but also

Transit advocate Kevin Thuman told Commissioners that they had an underfunded transit system, but said he was for once in agreement with Calvert and Jaroch that they board should fund the HART TDP.

 

“Tens of thousands of people depend on this transit system. It’s in your hands,” he said. “And I know, because I’ve seen it before, that each one of you when you see agreement like this, we’ll seize this opportunity, and take a chance to fund transit today.”

But when it came time to vote, the BOCC went ahead with the $812 million transpiration plan, with just $1 million of that earmarked for transit.

 
Page 15 of 81« First...10...1314151617...203040...Last »