Commissioner Murman quoted in this Tampa Bay Times article on transportation tax:

 

Hillsborough commission rejects transportation sales tax 4-3

 

Wednesday, April 27, 2016 6:50pm

TAMPA — After three years of planning, debate and controversy, Hillsborough County is right back where it started: with no idea how to pay for hundreds of millions of dollars worth of transportation needs.

The county commission voted 4-3 on Wednesday night to reject the proposed 30-year, half-cent sales tax, refusing to put it on the November ballot and letting voters decide.

Commissioner Victor Crist, long considered the swing vote, swung against the plan around 10:15 p.m. after residents and commissioners spent four hours debating the measure.

Crist said he would anger half the room no matter what he chose, so he made his decision based “on simple, old fashioned intuition.”

“Sadly tonight a majority of the County Commission has refused to give the citizens of Hillsborough County an opportunity to decide for themselves whether their future includes a better transportation system,” said Tampa Mayor Bob Buckhorn in an email to the Tampa Bay Times after the vote. ” For over a million of our neighbors and businesses the chance to vote for a better future was denied.

“Rather than a profile in courage this vote was a profile in cowardice.”

Commissioner Sandy Murman also opposed the tax. She had come out against the plan months ago, but on Wednesday briefly entertained the 30-year option thanks to a compromise pitched by Commissioner Kevin Beckner. But then she quickly reverted.

“We’re asking (voters) to trust us with a blank check for 30 years,” Murman said. “I cannot go there.”

Commissioner Ken Hagan made a last-ditch attempt to get some kind of transportation tax on the ballot, making a motion for a 20-year tax.

That was also defeated 4-3. Commissioners Al Higginbotham and Stacy White, who have always opposed any half-cent tax, joined Crist and Murman in voting against both plans.

County Administrator Mike Merrill, who has long championed the 30-year plan, said he did not expect the outcome of Wednesday’s vote. He offered no further comment.

Murman asked the board to hold yet another transportation workshop in the near future. It passed unanimously.

“I am very disappointed that after years of work this board was not able to build consensus,” Beckner said. “I do look forward to the continued dialogue at our upcoming meeting and I’m hopeful that we might still be able to come to a consensus on such an important community issue as transportation.”

The evening started when more than 200 people gathered at All People’s Life Center to share their views on a sales tax projected to raise $117.5 million a year for road and transit projects throughout the county for the next three decades.

But entering the meeting it was unclear whether the commission would approve the half-cent plan — or any of the plans pitched at the last-minute. While county staff and consultants put together a 30-year sales tax plan, some commissioners seem to favor a 10-year plan as a compromise. That was the plan Beckner tried to pitch, one Buckhorn and other transit advocates blasted in the days leading up to the vote.

Once residents had their say, Hagan moved to approve the 30-year tax. Commissioner Les Miller seconded the motion.

Then Beckner tried to swing the commission toward the 30-year plan, proposing the creation of an 11-person committee to oversee tax revenues.

While some were receptive to that idea, others were not. Higginbotham and Crist were not happy that such changes were suggested at the last minute and opposed the amendment, as did White.

Another of the tax’s opponents, Murman, seemed receptive to that idea.

“I do think that this transportation advisory board strengthens that oversight very much,” Murman said. “I think it gives a lot more credibility and transparency.”

However, it was not enough to convince her.

The sales tax hike was just one piece of the transportation funding puzzle — albeit the most important piece. The commission on Tuesday night unanimously voted to approve mobility fees, which starting Jan. 1 will require developers to pay more to cover the cost of the transportation improvements needed to support the growth caused by their projects.

Mobility fees could raise anywhere from $5 million to $35 million depending on many factors — but that’s nowhere near the $117.5 million a year the half-cent would have raised for decades.

Earlier in the evening, the business community and transportation groups like the Tampa Bay Area Regional Transportation Authority spoke out in support of the 30-year plan.

“This is a critical moment in our history,” TBARTA Executive Director Ray Chiaramonte said. “Is it a perfect plan? No. But it’s what the community said they want and are willing to accept.”

About 65 people addressed the commission. They seemed split evenly for and against the tax. Each side was applauded at the end of their statements. Their opinions ranged from decrying light rail to urging commissioners not settle for anything less than a 30-year tax.

But many speakers, especially those from unincorporated areas such as Lutz and Riverview, expressed outrage and frustration that the commission was considering another sales tax after voters rejected a full-cent tax in 2010.

“Commissioners, please, we’ve been lied to,” said Tim Curtis, 59, of Plant City. “We want to solve the problem, we really, really do … but what you’re offering us right now is just another way to take more money from us. That doesn’t solve the problem.”

Some blamed the commission itself for allowing Hillsborough’s transportation problems — and lack of solutions — to reach this point.

“The situation we’re in now is a consequence of you all not doing your jobs,” said Mark Turner, 61, of New Tampa. “This plan that’s been put forward, in my view, lacks both substance and foresight.”

Matthew Durshimer was all for the 30-year sales tax. He said it was the only way Hillsborough would attract corporate relocations and a younger workforce. Only the 30-year tax, he argued, would allow the county to build a real transit system.

“And if the answer is no, then expect all the problems of today to get worse tomorrow,” Durshimer said, “and expect all the young professionals like myself to leave this community.”

 

Commissioner Murman quoted in this Tampa Tribune article on transportation tax:

 

TRANSPORTATION

Hillsborough commissioners vote 4-3 to reject transportation sales tax

 

 

By Mike Salinero | Tribune Staff

Published: April 27, 2016

Updated: April 28, 2016 at 06:03 AM

 

TAMPA — A three-hour hearing Wednesday night ended in disappointment for transit advocates as Hillsborough County Commissioners voted 4-3 against putting a half-cent-per-dollar sales tax for transportation before voters on the Nov. 8 ballot.

Commissioners Sandy Murman, Victor Crist, Stacy White and Al Higginbotham, all Republicans, voted against both a 30-year and a 20-year tax, leaving the county’s transportation future in limbo. Democrats Les Miller and Kevin Beckner were joined by Republican Ken Hagan in voting for the referendum.

As expected, Crist was the swing vote, saying he made his decision during the three-hour meeting.

“Frankly, the decision I made tonight was not based on data, it was not based on one thing I heard,” Crist said. “It was just old-fashioned intuition.”

He said he counted 31 speakers for the tax, 31 against it.

Murman said she could not vote for an “all or nothing” tax of 30-year duration when the county’s project list to be financed by the tax lasted only 10 years. When it was clear she was voting against the tax, opponents in the audience started to cheer. She motioned for them to stop.

“We should not be rejoicing because we need to go back and keep working on this,” Murman said. “Back to the drawing board.”

The public hearing drew 100 to 200 people, split about evenly between supporters and opponents. More than 60 people spoke to the commission and each side applauded speakers with whom they agreed. Many of the opponents of the measure wore red shirts with stickers affixed that had the word “Tax” encircled and a line slashed through it. Some of the speakers said they were from Pinellas County, where they led efforts to kill the Greenlight Pinellas transportation referendum in 2014.

Opponents urged commissioners not to saddle their children and grandchildren with a 30-year tax.

“I don’t want my grandchildren strapped with a tax that they will be paying for the majority of their lives,” said Shirley Wood. “A bad plan like this should never be put on the ballot.”

Len Mead wore a tri-cornered hat with the emblem, “Taxed enough Already.” Mead said the county was “swimming in taxes.”

“I looked at your own figures,” Mead said. “Unfortunately, you’re only spending 3 percent of your budget on transportation. Look at the average of all the counties in Florida. They’re spending 30 percent of their budget on transportation.”

A number of members of the Greater Tampa Chamber of Commerce turned out to speak in favor of the tax. The chamber board endorsed the tax in the past two weeks, saying a revitalized transportation system is necessary to compete for high wage jobs.

The vote was the culmination of a process that started more than three years ago when county commissioners unanimously agreed to form a policy group on transportation. This Policy Leadership Group included the seven commissioners plus the mayors of Hillsborough’s three cities and the chairman of the Hillsborough Area Regional Transit board.

The idea was to get buy-in from all corners of the 1,000-square-mile county — urban and rural, city and unincorporated county. County officials sought to avoid the fractures that doomed a 2010 Hillsborough transportation referendum — a plan that rural and suburban dwellers saw as focused primarily on light rail for Tampa.

Starting in early 2015, the new transportation initiative got a name — Go Hillsborough — and under that banner, an unprecedented public outreach campaign went forward. County officials held 86 public workshops attended by 2,853 people.

County leaders spoke about the need for additional money to fund transportation. Tens of thousands more county residents made their feelings known during four telephone town halls, or visited the Go Hillsborough website to learn more.

The comments were integrated with the county’s $8 billion backlog of needed projects — new and widened road roads, resurfacing of existing roads, bridge repairs and sidewalks.

 

Commissioner Murman quoted in this Tampa Bay Business Journal article on Mobility Fees:

 

 

Mobility fee ordinance passes in Hillsborough, despite concern for small businesses

Apr 26, 2016, 9:39pm EDT

The Hillsborough Board of County Commissioners unanimously passed a mobility fees ordinance to help fund the area’s transportation needs; but not without a few changes.

The mobility fees for new construction won passage Tuesday night at East Bay High School in Gibsonton, setting the stage for a vote on the controversial Go Hillsborough half-cent sales tax initiative tomorrow night.

A mobility fee is a one-time capital charge imposed on developers to pay for their share of the impact stemming from their residential and commercial projects. The fees are paid only once based on land use and size. They would replace the county’s current impact fee schedule which was first put into place in 1985 and updated in 1989.

At the public hearing Tuesday night, the board voted to conduct an annual review of the level of fees for the first five years, and added language to allow redaction of trade secrets from contracts being submitted to the county. In addition, the board set a single schedule on the phasing in of the mobility fees over a five-year period. The fees start at 40 percent and increase gradually over the five-year period.

At the hearing, Jennifer Doerfel of the Tampa Bay Builders Association, said her industry “more often than not, has been the sole source of revenue for a capital road improvement through the development agreement process.” She called the policy that has been in place for the past 30 years “a failed one” and said her group “will support a fair fee for a fair level of service.” She expressed concern that the mobility fee would pass but that “other funding sources will not materialize,” referring to the Go Hillsborough sales tax initiative.

At the hearing, Commissioner Sandra Murman insisted that the fee levels be reviewed every year for the first five years because she felt they were “exorbitant.” She expressed concern about the effect of the fees on small businesses. “We do not want to hamper small business development in Hillsborough County,” she said.

The percentage of the mobility fee assessed based on the date of initial assessment will be:

40 percent (January 1, 2017)

50 percent (January 1, 2018)

70 percent (January 1, 2019)

80 percent (January 1, 2020)

90 percent (January 1, 2021)

The schedule above as structured can go ahead no matter the outcome of the controversial Go Hillsborough half-cent sales tax initiative that will undergo a public hearing Wednesday.

The county administrator’s office originally proposed two schedules. But Commissioner Stacy White made a motion to start the schedule at 40 percent instead of 30 percent. White expressed concern that if the sales tax doesn’t pass, the money collected from the mobility fees might be lower than the current impact fee program.

Under the ordinance, the mobility fees will be collected from five districts in the county. The majority of the fee money will be spent in the district from which it is collected. The ordinance also includes a hearing officer and appeals process for those seeking to request an adjustment of the fee level.

Certain projects would be grandfathered under the ordinance so that the prior impact fees would apply instead of the new mobility fees. Among those projects would be those approved or under review by April 26, 2016. In addition, development agreements reached or under review prior to that date would also be grandfathered.

The county’s total unfunded transit needs would be approximately $905 million in the first 10 years and grow to $977 million in the next 10, according to County Administrator Mike Merrill. The Go Hillsborough sales tax is estimated to bring in $117 million annually. Under the Go Hillsborough plan, the bulk of money generated in the first 10 years would go to Hillsborough County, which would get $649 million or 55 percent. Meanwhile, HART would get $294 million or 25 percent of the funds for the bus system that it operates. The city of Tampa would receive 17 percent or $198 million. Plant City would get 2 percent or $20 million while Temple Terrace would get 1 percent or $14 million.

The money currently generated from impact fees are considered woefully short when it comes to supplying funds for the county’s growing transportation needs. Back in 1989 when the impact ordinance was last updated, the cost of construction to add a two-lane mile of road was $1.2 million. Since then, the cost has soared by 600 percent to nearly $4.7 million to build a comparable area of roadway.

 

Commissioner Murman quoted in this Tampa Bay Times article on transportation:

 

Are Hillsborough commissioners on verge of consensus days before crucial transportation vote?

 

Friday, April 22, 2016 8:11pm

 

TAMPA — Just days before a critical vote, Hillsborough County commissioners say they’re confident they will pass a transportation sales tax increase for residents to consider in a November referendum.

But the scope of the tax could be considerably less than the 30-year, half-cent proposal that county staff, local political leaders and consultants have recommended.

That’s according to three commissioners — Kevin Beckner, Victor Crist and Sandy Murman — who have stood on or near the fence during the past several months of debate on Go Hillsborough, the county’s transportation initiative. They’re expected to vote on a plan after Wednesday’s public hearing.

“The consensus from what I hear in the community is a long-term tax plan is not going to pass in November,” Murman said Friday. “Something more reasonable may have a shot and it won’t divide the community.”

Even that position is a significant shift for Murman. In November, she opposed any sales tax increase and until recently was still pushing a package that included a 5-cent gas tax, the BP oil spill settlement and higher mobility fees on development to pay for roads and transit.

Now, Murman appears more closely aligned with Beckner and his proposal to send to voters a 10-year referendum that could be renewed each decade. On Friday, Beckner said he is willing to consider a 20-year tax hike, but not 30 years.

“A 30-year time frame is just an awfully long time frame for voters to weigh in again,” he said.

A half-cent sales tax increase, if approved by voters, is projected to bring in $117.5 million a year.

One option floated Friday is for commissioners to pass a shorter-term tax. In the meantime, as shovels start moving dirt, the Hillsborough Area Regional Transit Authority would conduct a countywide transit study and examine the feasibility of buying rail lines from CSX Transportation for commuter rail. With those studies in hand, the county would go back to voters in four years and ask for a longer, and maybe bigger, sales tax increase.

“By the time that information comes back to us, there is a pretty clear picture of how we integrate urban and suburban areas,” Murman said, “we have a clear picture of the cost and what we need for a good transit system to move people around in our community.”

But Commissioner Les Miller brushed that off: “What does that do for us in the meantime when the county’s roads are continuing to deteriorate?”

Miller also said a 10-year tax “gets us nothing” and would prevent Hillsborough from unlocking federal dollars. Miller, like Commissioner Ken Hagan, supports the 30-year, half-cent option.

Crist, for months an undecided swing vote, said he wants to get something done. But he preferred a compromise that could pass the commission 5-2, instead of a narrow 4-3 vote. Commissioners Stacy White and Al Higgingbotham will likely vote against any sales tax increase.

“For this to make it at the polls, the board is going to have to get behind it,” Crist said. “And if it barely squeaks through the board it may not squeak through the electorate.”

But anything less than 30 years would lose the support of one of the transportation initiative’s biggest cheerleaders: Tampa Mayor Bob Buckhorn.

Buckhorn and the Policy Leadership Group, an organization of elected leaders from the county and three cities (Tampa, Temple Terrace and Plant City), endorsed a 30-year, half-cent tax in November. That option was also recommended by County Administrator Mike Merrill and the group’s consultant, Parsons Brinckerhoff.

A 10- or 20-year tax would kill the rail system that would connect downtown Tampa to Tampa International Airport that the city plans to build with its share of the tax increase, Buckhorn said. Without a dedicated, 30-year revenue stream, he can’t get the bonding to make it affordable.

No train would significantly lessen the amount of money dedicated to transit in Go Hillsborough.

“If it’s a 10-year tax then they can count me out because I’m not going to waste my time,” Buckhorn said. “It doesn’t solve any of our needs, it wastes a lot of our time and political capital on an initiative not worth pursuing. At some point some of those commissioners are going to have to demonstrate political courage.”

The current half-cent proposal has stiff opposition from tea party Republicans — who say Go Hillsborough is a Trojan horse for rail — and, ironically, some Democrats and conservationists. The Democratic Party of Hillsborough County nearly voted last week to officially take a position against the 30-year, half-cent sales tax plan because it didn’t have enough transit. At the last minute, the vote was delayed a month.

Still, by any measure, last week was the best stretch in months for the controversial transportation plan.

Commissioners on Wednesday unanimously approved a $905 million list of transportation projects to complete in the next 10 years, including hundreds of intersection, road and sidewalk improvements, new and widened roads in suburban Hillsborough, bus rapid transit in Brandon and a ferry connecting MacDill Air Force Base and SouthShore.

And on Thursday the Greater Tampa Chamber of Commerce, the largest business group in the county, endorsed a half-cent sales tax increase — for at least 20 years.

Murman believes the commission is close to a consensus. Approving a project list was particularly important, she said, because it demonstrated the county has a plan and voters aren’t just handing over a blank check.

“We’ve done it before on tough subjects,” Murman said, “and I think we’ll do it again.”

 

 

Commissioner Murman mentioned in this Observer article on Rock Ponds ecosystem:

 

At Rock Ponds: Celebrating the restoration of Florida’s unique beauty

By MITCH TRAPHAGEN

 

There likely could not be a more appropriate way to celebrate the opening of the largest habitat restoration project in the Tampa Bay area than with the release of wild birds that had been rehabilitated, nursed back to health from injuries. Those birds will join thousands of their feathered kindred, along with mammals of all kinds, animals that have populated the now-restored area for the ages.

Years ago, it could have been the site of a power plant. But the delicate, yet durable eco-system of Rock Ponds was purchased and then restored by multiple agencies and volunteers, headed by the Southwest Florida Water Management District’s Surface Water Improvement and Management (SWIM) program.

The Rock Ponds restoration project, located on County Line Road near Cockroach Bay in Hillsborough County and bordering the Manatee County Line is, at 1,043 acres, the largest restoration project in the history of Tampa Bay. In comparison, New York City’s famed Central Park totals 843 acres.

“Welcome to Rock Ponds!” exclaimed Brandt Henningsen, Ph.D., who, along with Nancy Norton, was the project co-manager, during the dedication ceremony held on April 13.

“This project is an amazing example of cooperation,” Henningsen said. “We had over 33 different organizations and agencies working on this, and 26 of those were unpaid. We had 1.550 volunteers that provided over 6,400 hours of volunteer time. And we have more plans for the future.”

 

While Rock Ponds is the largest restoration project in the Tampa Bay area, it is one of 96 restoration projects in the area completed since 1989.

“We have restored more than 4,600 acres of habitat around Tampa Bay,” Henningsen said. “That’s more than 7.2 square miles.”

Henningsen went on to thank the many people involved, including representatives from Tampa Bay Watch, revealing the public-private nature required to complete the project.

The area is stunningly beautiful with freshwater and estuary wetlands marked by pines and hardwood hammock trees. To the west, on a clear Florida morning, ships can be seen traversing Tampa Bay while the St. Petersburg skyline glimmers on the horizon. Further to the south, the faint outline of the Sunshine Skyway marks the horizon, appearing as sculptured art and land bridge.

But the beauty of the Rocks Ponds area itself dwarfs that vista. Today it has been restored to Florida’s abundant natural beauty, with birds flying across the serene waters and trees with the abandon their ancestors enjoyed long before development came to the Sunshine State.

“This project is really opportunity amazing. It’s amazing what we’ve been able to accomplish,” said Robert Beltran of the Southwest Florida Water Management District.

Beltran went on to thank the many county, state and federal officials who all joined in to make the immense project possible, including Hillsborough County Commissioner Sandra Murman and Senator Bill Nelson.

And the sheer scale of the project required a near unprecedented level of help and cooperation.

“We moved 1.6 million yards of dirt,” said Joe Rodi, the operations manager for QSG Development, the principal contractor on the project. Rodi compared that much dirt to an area the size of a football field and as tall as the 42-floor Bank of America Tower in downtown Tampa.

The volunteers came from organizations as varied as the Boy Scouts, numerous area schools — ranging from East Bay High School to private and public schools in Tampa — Hillsborough County Public Works, the Manatee County Sheriff’s Office and area businesses, along with at least 1,500 individual volunteers.

The entire project involved the planting of more than 980,000 upland and wetland plants, and included the largest one-day volunteer marsh planting effort in the history of Tampa Bay, with 289 volunteers installing 40,000 marsh plugs in November 2015.

Already officials and volunteers have seen the results of their efforts, with sightings of snook, mullet and tarpon in the waters; great egrets, roseate spoonbills, sandhill cranes, pelicans, ospreys and bald eagles nesting in the trees; and bottle-nosed dolphins, deer and bobcats enjoying the clean, fresh air.

And, importantly, they are seeing the work they completed, nature being nursed back to health, beginning to take root on its own, with the growth of new seagrasses and other plant life.

At the end of the ceremony, Ed Straight, president of Wildlife Inc., released birds that had been nursed back to health after injuries, into their beautiful and expansive new home. Included was a sandhill crane that was injured by a golf ball, a hawk that had been hit by a car, an osprey and a crested caracara, also known as “Mexico’s Eagle,” the largest falcon in North America.

“Some of the birds are anxious to go, some may not fly away quickly,” Straight said. And then, adding with a smile, “If they fly into the crowd, you don’t have to run faster than the birds can fly, you just have to run faster than everyone else.”

There were no such worries. Despite how they arrived there or from where, all of the birds seemed to know they were home. The osprey and hawk immediately took to the air, while the sandhill crane and crested caracara simply stepped out of their cages and calmly took stock of their new surroundings before flying off into freedom.

Rock Ponds is a treasure of stunning beauty that is unique to Florida. It is a home and respite both for wildlife and for us. It existed for ages before development arrived and now, thanks to the dedication of numerous organizations, scientists and volunteers, the largest restoration project in the history of Tampa Bay will exist for the ages to come, and for the people who come after us. The years of work restored the land, and now nature is taking over that work. Like seeing an osprey or a hawk fly off into a new home, Florida is truly amazing and beautiful.

“This project is a labor of love,” Henningsen said, gazing out at the healthy and beautiful vista, the result of humanity’s passion and work alongside nature’s miracles.

 

Commissioner Murman quoted in this Tampa Bay Business Journal article on MOSI:

 

Hillsborough commissioners talk money with MOSI

Apr 21, 2016, 7:07am EDT

Plans by the Museum of Science and Industry to relocate to downtown Tampa should give a boost to fundraising.

That should also help close a $176,000 operating deficit, Mike Schultz, MOSI board chair, told the Hillsborough County Board of County Commissioners on Wednesday.

County commissioners approved a report from MOSI detailing plans to relocate from its current site on Fowler Avenue near University of South Florida to downtown, likely within the planned Urban Waterfront District being developed by Strategic Property Partners, the real estate company controlled by Tampa Bay Lightning owner Jeff Vinik and Cascade Investment LLC.

“MOSI at a new downtown location will be sized and operated to be financially sustainable over the long term,” a feasibility study said.

The museum has operated at a deficit for several years, and Commissioner Sandy Murman asked Schultz, who is president and CEO of Florida Hospital’s West Florida region, how MOSI will reduce the shortfall and balance its budget.

There will be additional revenue at a reinvented MOSI once the museum moves, but that’s three to five years away, Schultz said.

“The big question is, between now and the time we move. We have a number of things we’re working on,” he said. “We need to continue to work on revitalizing the exhibits at MOSI and Molly [Demeulenaere, MOSI president and CEO] has a very good plan over the next 24 months to do that in a way that makes sense.”

MOSI also has redirected some of the $2 million from a gift from Florida Hospital in 2014. The gift was designed to convert the IMAX DOME Theatre to 3D digital technology.

“It doesn’t make sense to spend a lot of money on a domed projection, when were not sure we’re going to have a domed theater in the new location,” he said. “We’ve redirected some of the money to help with the financial deficits that we’re currently experiencing.”

Fundraising over the last two years has been difficult because of the financial condition of the museum, Schultz said. “I think this will stir interest in the community as to a new life and a new opportunity for MOSI.”

The feasibility study projects total estimated operating expenses of $13.6 million in a stable year of operation at a downtown site, and earned income of $11.3 million.

It also projects additional fiscal benefits for Hillsborough County and the state, including $54.4 million in economic impact in the county and $66.4 million in economic impact in the state.

 

Commissioner Murman quoted in this BayNews9 article on transportation plan:

 

Hillsborough commissioners approve transporation plan dependent on sales tax hikeg list of road improvements included in the transportation plan relies on a proposed half-cent sales tax increase for funding.

By Dalia Dangerfield, Reporter Last Updated: Wednesday, April 20, 2016, 5:31 PM

 

TAMPA — 

Hillsborough County commissioners on Wednesday approved an initial transportation plan that could be funded by a sales tax increase.

  • Plan includes long list of road improvements
  • Funding would come from a half-cent sales tax increase
  • Tax increase must go through a referendum

The plan includes a very long list of projects, including but not limted to:

  • Sidewalk repairs at schools like Clair Mel Elementary
  • More lanes added to Progress Boulevard along the I-75 overpass
  • Converting Big Bend Road into a six-lane roadway

The potential transportation projects are contingent, however, on a controversial half-cent sales tax referendum. Hillsborough commissioners have not decided whether to put that referendum on the ballot.   “We take one step at a time,” said Hillsborough Commissioner Sandra Murman.   If the referendum on the tax increase does make it on the ballot, it’s unclear whether voters will give it the green light. With that possibility in mind, commissioners agreed on a contingency transportation plan, just in case. Soon, the public will be invited to weigh in on that contingency plan, as well.   A public hearing is scheduled for next Wednesday at the All People’s Life Center on Sligh Avenue.

 

 

Commissioner Murman quoted in this WFLA article on Citrus Park Extension:

 

Controversial Hillsborough County road project may get green light

The Citrus Park Drive extension has been in the works for years

By Chip Osowski

Published: April 20, 2016, 3:53 pm  Updated: April 20, 2016, 7:25 pm

 

HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, Fla (WFLA) – A controversial road extension project could soon get the green light in Hillsborough County. The Citrus Park Drive extension project has been in the works for years, and money issues and public opposition have kept it on the back burner.

The project would extend Citrus Park Drive from Countryway Boulevard to Sheldon Road, creating another east-west corridor for commuters in northwestern Hillsborough County. Currently, motorists are limited to Linebaugh Avenue, the main thoroughfare through Westchase.

Many residents in and around Westchase look forward to another corridor to alleviate traffic. Lindsey Smith is one of them. “I would love the Citrus Park extension to go through,” Smith said. “We live over by the mall so it would be an easy access to the library and other things like the park.”

Vanessa Vogt lives in the Eagles and thinks it would make her commute less stressful. “Traffic in the morning and the evening, too much,” Vogt said. “Tampa’s roadways, I think, are very congested. Any help we could get with that would be perfect. ”

Those opposed to the project live in the neighborhoods that line Citrus Park Drive and the proposed path of the roadway. Glen Muir is concerned the increased traffic will make the street in front of his neighborhood a racetrack.

“For me, I don’t really see the point. Personally, as a resident living here, we’re a little isolated. We don’t have issues with cars racing down this road all the time,” Muir said. “I think once you open it up, you could end up with that and some dangerous situations.”

Blanchard Stanaland is another area resident who has reservations about the extension. He enjoys walking his dogs on the sidewalk that borders the dead end road.

“I like the privacy. I like being able to walk my dogs without it being a four lane highway,” Stanaland said. “I’d rather not have to see and deal with traffic. That’s part of the reason we moved here. It’s so private. ”

The project would be funded under a proposed transportation sales surtax.  The county is holding a public hearing on the matter on Wednesday, April 27th at 6pm at the All People’ Life Center at 6105 E. Sligh Avenue in Tampa.

Hillsborough County Commissioner Sandra Murman represents the area of the county impacted by the extension. She hopes to give the project a green light.

“It is a shovel ready project. All the permits, it’s ready to go,” Murman said. “And I will fight really hard for it because right now people only have one way to get in or out of Westchase and that is Linebaugh Avenue.”

 

Commissioner Murman quoted in this StPetersBlog article on transportation:

 

Hillsborough Commissioners approve Go Hillsborough project list

MITCH PERRY

 

Hillsborough County Commissioners voted unanimously on Wednesday to approve the list of projects to be built in the unincorporated areas of the county in the Go Hillsborough plan. The BOCC will vote next week on whether to put the half-cent sales tax on the November ballot.

Commissioner Sandy Murman was the most vigilant board member to question county officials about specific projects on the list, though she did acknowledge her pleasure in that half of the money, and a third of those projects on the list, are all located in South Hillsborough, an area that she represents and says has been left out of getting vital bus routes.

 

“I say amen,” she said, smiling.

“Does that mean we’ll get your vote?” asked County Commissioner Les Miller. “We take it one step at a time,” Murman responded.

 

Murman has already declared she won’t support the proposal. Miller says he will be voting for it.

Murman challenged Deputy County Administrator Lucia Garsys regarding whether specific routes, like a HART circulator in South Hillsborough County, were on the list of projects. Garsys said ultimately that HART CEO Katharine Eaganneeded to provide written assurances on the timing of when that would come online.

 

In a separate motion, Commissioners unanimously approved an amendment offered by Kevin Beckner that would produce a “comprehensive, integrated transit systems plan,” which would be executed jointly with the county, HART, the Florida Department of Transportation and the Metropolitan Planning Organization all involved.

 

“We’re doing all this, but we gotta make sure it connects to a bigger system, and that everybody connects into a bigger system,” concurred Commissioner Sandy Murman.

“I think we fully need to have a regional perspective,” added Commissioner Ken Hagan.

 

County Administrator Mike Merrill says that would require a change in the final project list. He promised commissioners he’d have an update list to distribute to them by week’s end.

 

Board members realize that next Wednesday night’s public hearing on the proposed transportation tax could be a lengthy process, and some commissioners thought that the three-minutes usually allotted for public speaking should reduce to two minutes. Ultimately, Commission Chair Les Miller said he’d keep it at three minutes, for now, subject to changing that when he sees how many are in attendance on Wednesday night.

The hearing is 6 p.m. Wednesday, April 27. It will be at the All People’s Life Center, 6105 E Sligh Ave. in Tampa.

 

Commissioner Murman mentioned in this Tampa Tribune article on Anti-bullying town hall meeting:

 

EDUCATION

‘Blind Side’ actor delivers anti-bully message during town hall meeting

 

BY GEOFF FOX Tribune staff

Published: April 18, 2016

Updated: April 19, 2016 at 07:51 AM

 

TAMPA — Quinton Aaron is a massive man.

While his prodigious size helped him land a starring role in the 2009 Academy Award-winning film, “The Blind Side,” in which he portrayed football player Michael Oher, it also made him an easy target for childhood bullies.

On Monday night, the burly, 6-foot-8-inch Aaron, 31, spoke of those past experiences during an anti-bullying town hall meeting moderated by Hillsborough County Commissioner Sandy Murman at Blake High School. More than 100 parents, students and school officials attended.

“I was always a skinny kid, kinda tall, had a big forehead and crooked teeth,” he said. “I got beat up and thrown down stairs, stuck with pencils. None of it stopped until I started talking up. Telling is the best defense you have. The people in school are there to protect you. It doesn’t matter if you’re called a tattle-tale or a snitch.

“Bullying won’t stop until you stand up for yourself and tell adults what’s going on.

These (bullies) don’t fear getting in trouble. As long as you don’t say anything, they won’t get in trouble.”

Once Aaron told his mother of his problems, he said she hounded school officials until the problems ceased.

“You have to speak up.” said Aaron, who in 2012 started a foundation in his name to raise awareness of bullying and childhood obesity.

Besides Aaron, panelists included Hillsborough County Schools Superintendent Jeff Eakins, law enforcement representatives and mental health professionals.

Bullying includes “situations where an individual takes aggression against another person, not just teasing. It’s repeated attempts to harm another person,” said Oliver Tom Massey, division director in the University of South Florida’s Department of Child and Family Studies.

“There’s cyber-bullying that doesn’t even occur face-to-face: texting, Facebook, making fun of people on the Internet,” Massey said. “At one time we thought (bullying) was a rite of passage that we all experienced, but that’s not true. Bullying can cause serious problems.”

Bullying also can be perpetrated physically, verbally, through social media and other ways. Victims may experience lower self-esteem, social isolation, anxiety and lower academic performance.

Some even commit suicide.

Eakins said that school officials work to ensure that “every classroom is conducive to learning, for students to feel safe, secure and cared for.”

“Whenever there’s a situation where that’s not the case, we need to take it very seriously,” he said. “We want students to stand up for other students and for students to know that the adults at school are their advocates.”

Former Tampa Police Chief Jane Castor acknowledged that bullying has affected nearly everyone at some point.

“When I was young, I was about 6 feet tall in second grade and weighed about 50 pounds,” Castor said. “It’s all about not only what you do about it, but especially, the younger kids here in the front row: Don’t turn your head when you see someone being bullied.

“People need to learn how to settle disagreements. We have to respect the fact that we’re all different.”

 
Page 24 of 81« First...10...2223242526...304050...Last »